Scripts & Props to Improve Collaboration
Description/benefits
We have found that when people cooperatively engage in an intellectual task like learning new academic material, differences in personality and prior knowledge often dictate the dynamics of the interaction. Unfortunately these collaborations are often not as satisfying or effective as they could be. For example, studies of standard tutoring often find the tutor benefits substantially more than the person being tutored. To ameliorate this situation, we have developed simple scripts that specify roles and activities that are designed to directly improve task performance and enhance transfer to individual tasks. An example of a simple cooperative learning script for dyads is as follows:
Both learners read to a specified stopping point.
Both put the learning materials out of sight.
One learner explains what has been covered to this point, while the other contributes by detecting and correcting errors.
Both learners look back through the material and make further corrections and decide on elaborations and strategies that will help them remember the key information.
They then switch roles and repeat steps 1 – 4.
This script encourages active processing, metacognition
, and elaboration on the part of both participants.
Research Principles
Across
a large number of studies we have found that using learning scripts
similar to the one described leads to significantly better recall
and test taking performance than does unscripted cooperative
learning or individual learning.
Further, after experiences with scripted cooperation, college
students perform better when they study individually.
In essence, there is evidence for a transfer of skills. (See
Dansereau & Johnson, 1994; O'Donnell & Dansereau, 1992.) Implementation/uses
These
simple scripts can be easily integrated into typical classroom
activities by having neighbors periodically enact the script over
material covered in a lecture.
Similar scripts can be used to help collaboration in
problem solving by having partners systematically interact during
the stages of problem definition, idea generation, and solution
selection and implementation.
Limitations
When
scripts are too vague, one learner in the collaboration may
loaf. On the other hand, a very detailed script may reduce
motivation for the task due to overload or to lack of fit with
personal aptitudes and styles. A script that both encourages
participation from all members and allows room for individual
approaches to the collaboration will be the most successful.
References
The following provide reviews of the
literature on scripted cooperation: Dansereau,
D. F., & Johnson, D. W. (1994). Cooperative
learning. (Chapter 5). In D.
Druckman & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance (pp. 83-111; references pp.
319-327). Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
O’Donnell, A. M.,& Dansereau, D. F.
(1992). Scripted cooperation in
student dyads: A method for
analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance.
In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in
cooperative groups: The
theoretical anatomy of group learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge
University Press.